Vol. 01 — 2026

Vibe Coding with Cursor & Claude Code in 2026: I Built a Production App — Honest Review

I vibe-coded a production Laravel 13 + AI agent app in 2026 using Cursor and Claude Code — no Stack Overflow tabs, just intent prompts, agent diffs, and a ruthless test suite. The result shipped in 40% fewer hours, but required human architecture at every critical turn.

Vibe coding — "expressing intent and letting agents write the code" — is the #1 AI-native engineering trend of 2026 per MoogleLabs. Here is the brutally honest field report from Junagadh, Gujarat.

1. What "Vibe Coding" Actually Means

Not autocomplete. Agents that: read your repo, plan a task, edit 15 files, run tests, and open a PR. You review, they type. My setup:

  • Cursor (Agent Mode) + Claude 4 Sonnet for scaffolding, refactors, and migrations
  • Claude Code in terminal for agentic loops across the codebase
  • Guardrail: every agent task must pass php artisan test + manual RBAC/security review

2. What Was Magical (Where Agents Win)

Boilerplate at 5x speed: CRUD, validation, seeders, Filament/Laravel scaffolding — agent first draft ~80% correct. Saved ~18 hours on a 50-hour project.

Refactors without fear: "Extract this service class, move queries to repository, add tests" — agent renamed across 40 files without boredom or typos.

Onboarding to legacy: "Explain this 2019 payment webhook flow" — agent traced the entire chain in 90 seconds. Replaced a half-day manual spelunk.

3. What Broke (Where Agents Lose — Expensively)

Architecture myopia: Left unsupervised, agents added a fourth way to query products instead of reusing the existing repository — perfectly working, perfectly wrong for 3-year maintenance. I rejected 1 in 3 agent PRs for architectural drift.

Hallucinated APIs: On a custom MCP integration, the agent invented a parameter that does not exist in the docs — confident, cited, false. Only a human reading the actual MCP spec caught it.

Security generosity: "Write a raw SQL search" — agent wrote an injectable query with string interpolation. Passed tests. Would have passed review without a security checklist.

Cost blindness: Routing everything to frontier models burned Rs 2,800 in tokens in one week. Switching to tiering (Flash/Sonnet/DeepSeek per task) cut it to Rs 620.

Full audit in AI Coding Agents: What They Ship vs Promise.

4. The Workflow That Actually Ships (My Rules)

  1. Small, verifiable tasks: Never "build feature X" — always "Add POST /api/leads with validation + 5 tests"
  2. Tests as the leash: Agent loops until php artisan test green. No tests = no merge.
  3. Human owns architecture: Data model, auth boundaries, and MCP contracts are human-designed; agents fill inside.
  4. Review like production: Every diff read as if a junior dev wrote it — because functionally, one did.

Built on our Laravel Web Development pipeline.

5. Verdict: Should Gujarat Founders Vibe Code in 2026?

If you can review code: vibe coding is a 30-40% accelerator and a talent multiplier — one strong dev now ships like 1.4 devs. If you cannot review: it is a liability factory that ships bugs faster than ever. The viral videos show the 2-hour build, not the 8-hour review that made it shippable.

Bottom Line

Vibe coding does not replace engineering judgment — it amplifies it. The winners in 2026 are not "most AI tools," they are "tightest review loops." I build with agents daily, but every commit is mine — and that is why clients trust it to run.

Want agente-assisted Laravel shipped with discipline? Let's talk.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is vibe coding safe for production Laravel apps?

Yes, if gated by tests, human architecture, and security review. Without those, agents ship tech debt faster than humans.

Cursor vs Claude Code — which is better in 2026?

Cursor wins for IDE-native agent loops; Claude Code wins for repo-wide terminal orchestration. I use both — Cursor for scaffolding, Claude Code for multi-file refactors.

Do I still need a developer if AI can code?

Yes — AI needs a reviewer who can spot injectable queries, architectural drift, and hallucinated APIs. No-code vibes demo; production needs engineering.

Does Deepak Bagada build with AI agents in Gujarat?

Yes — Junagadh-based, shipping Laravel + AI apps for Gujarat and India with agent-assisted but human-reviewed workflows.

← All journal articles Get in touch →